- T = Timing: Could the topic discussed in class find relevance among today’s contemporary social, political, economic, or religious affairs?
The fact that the Arab philosophers during the Umayyad Caliphate and the Abbasid Empire were interacting with the Greek civilization and came to terms together, shows the interconnectedness of the West and the East and the contribution of the Islamic community in science. This finds relevance among contemporary political and social affairs. Also, Al-Kindi’s counsels can be interpreted through a economic-political perspective, for example he sees the strive for private possessions as the reason for sorrow. Moreover, he says that possessions are not hold but are a loan, it is not your property. One can use this in order to argue against property rights and argue in favour of public goods and social-democratic policy.
- O = Opinion: Formulate your own opinion on the topic and related discussions.
I do agree with Al-Kindi’s point that the desire for possessions is unhealthy, because things are temporary and not permanent. He makes a good point by stating that sorrow is solely by convention and not by nature, because when a man is stripped of a possession he is sad, whereas many didn’t have that possession in the first place and were’nt sad. Also, I do support his point that we have to embed trivial habits into our lives that grow into significant ones, which can rescue us at times of crises. However, offers rationality and intellect as the remedy for suffering (depression). But intellect can also be temporary, you might get diagnosed with dementia and lose your intellectual capacities. Also, some people may be genetically predisposed to mental ilnesses such as depression. So their suffering is a result of their brain’s hormonal structures and not a consequence of contemptible desires. To conclude, some people may abuse their intellect to look down on others and see others as inferior, which is not healthy and natural.
- D = Debate: Can you offer an oppositional view challenging the topic and main arguments discussed in class?
Al-Kindi wrote his part in order to offer a remedy against sorrow and a means to live a happy and fulfilled live. He says that everything that makes you unhappy should be avoided. That we should construct a strategy to limit the amount we are exposed to sorrow as much as possible. But sometimes sorrow may be meaningful and natural, for example after losing a loved one. According to psychology it is very normal to suffer after a death of a person, and it is good to express your feelings and take your time. Suffering can make your life meaningful and change it in a positive way. It is unrealistic to expect yourself to be happy and fulfilled all the time.
- A = Argument: Can you summarise the thematic argument in a few short sentences?
Sorrow is a psychological pain that appears after the loss of loved things or the failure to obtain those things. Possessions and people are the cause of sorrow because they can be lost; they are temporary. Thus they shouldn’t be desired. Rationality and intellect is permanent, so people should strive for knowledge. This will be a remedy against sorrow and a way to live a happy and fulfilled life.
- Y = Yoda: How would Yoda epitomise the main topic discussed in class in his classically-famous aphorism?
”Knowledge is power.”